WELCOME TO HOTSUN LIMITED COMPANY
Buying guide · 2026-10-22 · Hotsun sourcing team
Most toy returns are not caused by bad design. They are caused by a material matched to the wrong chew strength. Silicone, TPR and nylon sit at three different points on the hardness scale, and the choice determines both the retail price point and the complaint rate.
Food-grade silicone is the softest of the three and tolerates high-temperature washing, which makes it the usual choice for puppies, senior dogs and toys that contact food — treat dispensers in particular. It does not develop the rubber smell some buyers object to, and it accepts strong pigments easily. Its weakness is tear resistance: for a determined chewer, silicone alone will not survive.
Thermoplastic rubber bounces, resists tearing and holds moulded detail well, which is why balls and interactive fetch toys are usually TPR. It sits between silicone and nylon in hardness. Hardness is normally quoted in Shore A: softer compounds are gentler on teeth but wear faster, harder compounds last longer but appeal less to the dog.
Nylon is the hardest common toy material and the correct recommendation for dogs that destroy softer toys. It resists puncturing and holds shape under sustained chewing. The trade-off is that it is unforgiving on teeth and unsuitable for puppies or senior dogs. It is also the material where sizing matters most — a nylon toy that is too small becomes a swallowing risk.
A practical rule: puppies, senior dogs and gentle chewers go to silicone; average adult dogs and fetch play go to TPR; known destroyers go to nylon. Selling a silicone toy to a power chewer generates a return and a review; selling nylon to a puppy owner generates a complaint about hardness.
For any material, confirm that squeakers sit in a separate enclosed compartment, that no small parts can be dislodged, and that any flavouring is infused into the material rather than coated on the surface. Coatings wear off quickly and are a frequent source of negative reviews.
Nylon and TPR are generally the most economical at volume, silicone sits in the middle, and plant-based or bio-blended materials carry a premium. That premium is easier to justify at retail when the packaging explains the material and its end-of-life handling — but only make environmental claims you can document against a recognised standard.
Choose the material from the dog, not from the price list. A range that covers all three tiers lets a retailer serve the whole market without sending a power chewer home with a silicone toy.
Browse the product catalogue · Request a sample or quote · More buying guides